Lecture in the 11th  International Conference of Meroitic Studies
              The Hafir as a Water Clarification Device
              Vienna, 1-4 september, 2008
               
              Among the identifying seals of the   Meroitic civilization the rain water reservoirs, the hafīrs, stands   notoriously. Their presence near ancient urban centers in the Butana was   indicated from the first reports, although they have not been object of   detailed descriptions. In the  70´s and 80´s of the last century, the   articles of Kleinschroth enlivened the attention on the matter, and in   the 90´s Hinkel offered two interesting synthesis. Only in the last   years the mission of the Humboldt Universität in Musawwarat underwent a   systematical and coherent study of the local great hafīr.
              Certainly we ignore almost   everything about these devices. A fact is beyond doubt, nonetheless:   their dimensions prove a technical ability and a high degree of   organization that only could be held by a powerful state structure, with   economic resources and manpower apt to build and to maintain them. In   this way it has been sustained that the hafīrs could represent   structures certainly functional but also symbolic of the Meroitic state   power, like the amphitheatres could have been for the Roman Empire.
              The lack of precise information on   the rest of the meroitic reservoirs lays many questions without answer.   To begin with, if we could assume as their purpose to store water runoff   after occasional rains, it could be debatable the use given to the   water stored, and opinions run from the employment for cattle and human   drinking, to their connection with cotton crops, as was suggested by   Abdalla (1984).
              Since they are in an intermediate   location between hills from which could arrive the water runoff, and   urban areas, the hafīrs could also have been stood as a defense against   possible alluviums, to limit their destructive power.
              If we cannot advance further   regarding their possible function, we believe that the comparison with   other facilities destined for water runoff storage built in regions of   similar ecology may result of some interest, and could provide   quantified data regarding the behavior of the reservoirs and the   situation of the water accumulated in them.
              Facilities similar to the meroitic   hafīrs have existed in different latitudes, as the tapkis in Nigeria,   ponds in Eastern Africa, tanks in India (where in many cases fish as   food source grow up), and also  reservorios in South America. In some   cases they were built in natural holes or where clay had been excavated   for construction, usually just out of the area of small urban   settlements. Some were covered with vegetation.
              In Argentina, at the southern end   of South America, there are interesting precedents related to human made   reservoirs that collected rainwater for drinking both of livestock and   human population (*). They were built from pre-Columbian times in the   northwest of the country, in arid zones of the Provinces of Catamarca,   La Rioja and Santiago del Estero. Most have ceased to be active with the   implementing of deep wells, but some continue in service to this day as   an alternative resource.
              This region was incorporated to the   Inca Empire in the late 15th century, a few decades before the Spanish   conquest. The skill of the Inca engineers to design complex systems of   drinkwater supply and storage is widely known. So, this could have been   the source of the technology involved in these reservoirs.
              This arid and hilly Argentine   region has a climatological situation similar to that of the   northeastern Sudan, with very scarce annual precipitation produced in   very brief periods.
              In the Ancasti Hills, desert zone   to the west of Catamarca, with mountains of up to 2000 m high, and in   the west of Santiago del Estero (Guasayán, Ambargasta and Sumampa   Hills), the so-called “represas” were built. They could show different   shapes, from rectangular to rounded, always with an entry faced in the   direction of arrival of the water. They were partially excavated and   with the excavated soil a perimetral wall was raised.
              Rain waters falling down on rocky   slopes slip at high speed and they infiltrate into minor proportion than   those falling in flat zones.
              In the Argentine northwest, with   scarce granitic launderings, the water runoff over loess soils becomes   an extremely cloudy stream, chocolate colored, loaded with suspended   solids. Once arrived to the reservoir, these products are quickly spread   over the whole liquid surface and then undergo a slow sedimentation   forming a waterproofing soil.
              The observation of these devices´   behaviour shows that the infiltration is usually more intense when a   great water height is maintained. When the liquid level descends, during   the dry season, the infiltration paradoxically also diminishes. A so   called "asintotic" tendency allows that some liquid level could remain   for several months.
              The stored water was used for   drinking both of human settlers and livestock, almost exclusively goats,   the only domestic species that may last the scarcity of grassland.
              In the Butana there exist bursts of   igneous or schist-cristaline rocks. The water slips between them   jumping over the stones at high speed and with minimal infiltration,   creating occasional sudden streams that as the settlers know very well   could become devastating.
              We know that the base of the great   hafīr of Musawwarat had been paired by grit and mud, covered by a layer   of thin sand. This could have created a waterproofing of the surface,   favoring the permanence of the liquid during longer periods.
              The evaporation depends on   temperature, moisture and wind speed. In the Butana the average   temperature of December/January is 30.4°C, whereas in June it comes to   43° C.
              It is worth noting that the high   walls of the hafīrs could behave as a barrier against the wind, which in   these regions constitute the principal evaporation agent.
              The annual evaporation in Argentina   ranges from 2000 to 2500 mm/year for small reservoirs in La Rioja, and   about 3000 mm in Catamarca, that is to say similar records to those in   the north of the Sudan: Deeker (1972), indicates for the Khashm el-Girba   dam in Atbara an annual evaporation of 2.200 mm, and Kleinschroth   (1986) quotes for the Butana 2600 mm/year.
              The total height of the great hafīr   of Musawwarat could have attained to 15 m, but we ignore what   proportion of the same was actually filled. It is reasonable to think,   nonetheless, that the mere existence of such high walls make think that   great water volumes were expected, at least occasionally. Otherwise it   seems unreasonable to have dedicated efforts and time to build   structures able to store such water height.
              Whereas in the arid region of   Catamarca the average annual precipitations range between 100 and 450   mm, and in the Plains of La Rioja range between  200 and 500 mm/year,   the scarce statistics indicate for Atbara little more than 50 mm/year,   distributed in approximately 7 days a year, and for Hudeiba scarcely 36   mm/year. Nevertheless, theoretically it could be maintained an important   liquid level up to the end of the period of "lean water" (lack of   rains).
              In the excavation of the Argentine   reservoirs, the base was not smoothed completely, but some depressions   were implemented, like extreme resource against the critical reduction   of the liquid level. In such a circumstance water could concentrate on   these depressions, and livestock (especially goats) could keep on   drinking. Certainly if the rains were excessively scarce it was   necessary to transfer the herds to some place with better water supply.
              In other regions the reservoirs   turned out to be the destination of urban garbage, causing the   unavoidable contamination of the stored water. This was not the case of   the Butana, as the hafīrs were relatively removed from the urban areas,   but it could be argued that the high perimetral walls could have been   also a practical way to prevent the access of livestock or settlers.
              A disadvantage that can appear in   the reservoirs is de-oxygenation, with proliferation of seaweed and   development of smells proper of a body of stagnant water. In the cases   of the Butana and the Argentine northwest it must be underlined the   seasonal character of the water storage, that avoided the development of   this adverse condition.
              Permanent surface reservoirs in a   hot climate are often subject to health hazards, while parasitic   diseases are much less common around non-perennial devices.
              In Argentina, the regular   observation and long time experience have allowed to verify that these   reservoirs could accomplish an unexpected function, because the stored   water undergoes an improval in its quality, through completely natural   reactions.
              As we have noted, solids dragged by   feeding water undertake a sedimentation in the reservoirs. The very   thin slime particles sediment slowly along 30 to 60 days, so that the   liquid becomes clarified. The coloidal particles (not visible at the   naked eye) probably award to the residual water some turbidity, such it   happens habitually in dams, but this does not affect its taste or smell. 
              Besides, water is not purified only   in order to its physical clarification, that reduces the concentration   of suspended matter, but a bacterial removal takes place also. It is the   effect of technical studied "storage", which throughout the time   produces a drop in the microbial population.
              Water with relatively low microbial   population exposed to permanent solar radiation can be rapidly and   effectively decontaminated through the simple action of ultraviolet   rays, developing a biological treatment with inhibition of pathogenic   bacteria.
              Biochemicals explain that certain   molecules of the bacteria (riboflavines, porfirines, citocromes) absorb   the quanta energy and get excited during less than a second, after which   they re-send the energy to other molecules, causing photo-oxidations in   residues of the proteins and in the nucleic acids bases: timine,   citosine and uracil. In simpler words, the process prevent the cellular   division, with lethal effects to the microorganisms.
              Also it is possible to generate singlete oxygen (1O2), a highly reactive radical, that as an oxidizer can destroy the cell.
              This way, the hafīrs could supply water with higher drinkability quality than that lifted from the Nile.
              Moreover, the water body of the   hafīrs presented a favorable environment for the development of aquatic   vegetation. Species as papyrus and reeds are known as valuable helpers   to improve the water quality. The potential for water purification of   these plants has been widely verified, and in the technical literature   they are recommended as simple and economic methods for drinking water   treatment.
              Perhaps some day further research could find proofs of the ancient presence of these plants in the meroitic hafīrs.
              In the last decades, the resource   of harvesting vegetable species has turned into an economic and   practical way for the improval of the physical and chemical conditions   in wastewater, particularly in the United States, and is known as   “biological filtration”. It has been applied in Alexandria, Egypt, where   common reed (Phragmites sp.), cattails (Typha sp.) and bulrush (Scirpus   sp.) were planted in several wetlands basins to polish wastewater   quality. They proved to be effective water clarifiers, assimilating and   removing inorganic matter.
              The ancient societies of the Nile   Valley have demonstrated to develop empirical procedures, that sometimes   anticipated the results of modern technology.
              Certainly we are not postulating   the application of sanitary skills with scientific criteria. Although   it´s probable that the meroitic builders of the hafīrs didn´t know how   such devices improved the water quality, we think that the experience of   many years could allow them to become aware of the beneficial results   effected on the water after certain storage period. The observation and   the record of results could make possible the correction of mistakes in   the design of the reservoirs and the linked structures. And their   efficiency was going to remain demonstrated up to the point of   continuing in use for many centuries after the sunset of the Meroitic   civilization.
              
              LITERATURE
              (*) For the following references I   am highly indebted to the late Eng. Carlos S. Carrique, a fellow of the   Academia Argentina de Ingeniería (personal communication).
              Abdalla, Abdelgadir M. (1984). “Summary of Discussion” on Meroitic Social Stratification. Meroitica 7, Berlin, p. 106.
              CIR/WHO (1981). Small Community Water Supplies – Technology of small water supply system in developing countries.
              Deekker, G. (1972). “A note on the Nile”. Water Resources Research 8 (4). pp. 818-928.
              Hinkel, M. (1991). “Hafire im antiken Sudan”. ZÄS 118, pp. 32–48.
              Hinkel, M. (1994). “The water reservoirs in Ancient Sudan”. In C. Bonnet (ed.), Études nubiennes, Vol.II, Genève, pp. 171–175.
              Jahn, S. A. A. (1984). “Traditional   water clarification methods using scientific observation to maximize   efficiency”. Waterlines 2, pp. 27-28.
              Kleinschroth, Adolf  (1986). “Die Verwendung des hafirs im Meroitischen Reich”. BzS 1, pp. 79-96.
              Miller, Robert L. (1990). “Ds-vessels, beer mugs, cirrhosis and casting slag”, GM 115, pp. 63-82.
              Reimold, Robert J. and Margaret A.   Mc Brien (1997). “Evaluating wetland treatment system for Alexandria,   Egypt”, Waste Environment & Technology, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 29-34.
              www.catamarca.gov.ar – Official web site of Catamarca Provincial Government, Argentina.
               
              Anterior 
              Home